ZoikoTime
Security

Protect workforce records without turning work into surveillance

Identity and access, encryption in transit and at rest, environment and tenant boundaries, change control, monitoring, incident response, evidence, human authority, and a clearly stated split of responsibility between ZoikoTime, your organization, and your providers.

Security dashboard visualization preview
Security without hidden observation

No screenshots, keystroke content, URL history, application-name monitoring, or clipboard collection under any tier or configuration.

Security telemetry covers approved identity, access, change, source-health, service, and incident events. It does not cover what a person types, reads, visits, or copies. Security logs are operational records — they are not worker-behavior scoring, and no administrator setting turns them into one.

Security Principles

Six Operating Rules Behind Every Control

Principles are not certifications. They describe how the controls below are designed — nothing more.

Least privilege, deny by default

Access is granted by explicit intersection, not inherited by seniority or role name.

Purpose limitation & minimization

Collect and retain only what the stated purpose requires. Restricted data stays out of ordinary logs and analytics.

Explicit scope

Tenant, entity, object, source, and action scope are stated rather than assumed.

Human authority

Consequential review stays with authorized people. Automation assists; it does not conclude.

Versioned change & correction

Changes carry versions and evidence. Corrections are recorded, not overwritten.

Secure defaults, transparent configuration

Defaults are safe, and what your administrators can change is visible to them.

Identity, Authentication & Administrative Access

How Identities Enter Scope, and What They May Do

Effective access is a deny-by-default intersection of role, tenant, entity, object, source, policy, and action. One role never grants unrestricted data access.

Identity & authentication

Current
Objective:Ensure human, administrator, and service identities are verified before entering scope, and can be revoked.
Scope
Human users, administrators, service identities · production
Summary
Session creation, renewal, expiration, revocation, and risk response. Directory provisioning and deprovisioning where supported.
Owner
Security · reviewed by Platform
Last reviewed
01 Jul 2026 · next 01 Jan 2027
Depends on:your identity provider, your user lifecycle process.
Limitations:Identity-provider integrations and authentication methods are stated per deployment. We do not claim phishing resistance, passwordless support, or specific SSO standards on this page — those are confirmed against your configuration. Recovery secrets and bypass methods are never published.

Authorization & administrative access

Current
Objective:Prevent access beyond an explicitly granted intersection, and make privileged action attributable.
Scope
All roles and administrative functions
Summary
Separate view, create, edit, approve, export, configure, and administer permissions. Sensitive configuration changes may require review or dual control where supported.
Owner
Security · reviewed by Product governance
Last reviewed
01 Jul 2026
You can inspect:effective permissions and their dependencies, where available.
Limitations:Dual control availability varies by function. There is no hidden super-admin and no unlogged emergency access — break-glass access requires a named authority, a stated reason, a time limit, and an audit record.

Data classification, minimization & protection

Current
Objective:Categorize data by sensitivity and protect it appropriately in transit and at rest.
Scope
Approved data categories · production
Summary
Collection and storage minimization; protection in transit and at rest; key and secret lifecycle governance; backup, export, temporary-data, and deletion treatment.
Owner
Security · reviewed by Privacy
Last reviewed
01 Jul 2026
Limitations:Algorithms, key lengths, rotation intervals, and vault topology are not published here — that detail routes through controlled review. Security protection does not replace privacy purpose, retention, or rights analysis; see Privacy.

Tenant, entity, environment & region boundaries

Partially implemented
Objective:Keep organization, entity, and environment scope separated, and govern any movement across them.
Scope
Tenant and organization context; entity, jurisdiction, and policy scope; production, testing, and development separation
Summary
Customer-specific configuration and data boundaries; provider and region dependencies; cross-region or cross-entity movement requires governed rules and evidence.
Owner
Platform · reviewed by Security
Last reviewed
28 Jun 2026
Partially implemented — stated scope:Environment separation and tenant context are current across all supported regions. Region-specific isolation guarantees are not claimed. We do not assert physical isolation or universal residency. Data location and residency is assessed region by region and remains a separate evidence-gated destination.

Secure development & change control

Current
Objective:Ensure changes reach production only through accountable gates, and can be reversed.
Scope
Application, configuration, and infrastructure change
Summary
Security requirements and threat-informed design review where appropriate; code and change review; test and dependency checks; release approval, deployment identity, and environment scope; configuration and infrastructure change history; rollback, emergency change, and retrospective review.
Owner
Engineering · reviewed by Security
Last reviewed
15 Jun 2026
Limitations:Some release gates are automated and evidenced rather than manually approved — we do not claim every change receives individual human sign-off, because that would be false. Repositories, tooling, and architecture detail are not published.

Logging, monitoring & source health

Current
Objective:Detect and investigate security-relevant events without surveillance overreach.
Categories logged
Identity, access, configuration, service, source-health, and security events
Summary
Purpose, retention, access, and minimization apply to logs. Alerts have named ownership, triage, and escalation. Clock, source, and integrity context is preserved where relevant.
Owner
Security
Last reviewed
01 Jul 2026
Limitations:We make no promise of complete detection — coverage is not measured to a published standard. Monitoring gaps and source failure produce visible uncertainty rather than silent assumption; see how that surfaces on System Status.
Never in security telemetry

Application-name monitoring, URL history, or keystroke content. Sensitive payloads and the prohibited surveillance categories are excluded from logs by design, not by configuration.

Incidents, Vulnerabilities & Recovery

Response, Disclosure, and What We Will Not Promise

Incident response

Current
Preparation, detection, triage, containment, recovery, and review. Severity and decision authority are defined internally; public summaries stay safe and accurate.
Current state
System Status is authoritative
Notification
Follows approved contractual, legal, and operational criteria
Owner
Security
Limitations:No guaranteed notification or recovery time unless contractually approved for your agreement. No public incident detail that would increase risk.

Vulnerability reporting

Current
A public reporting route with triage, validation, severity assignment, ownership, and remediation states. Duplicate, non-actionable, out-of-scope, and unsafe disclosures are handled explicitly.
Do not include
Credentials, worker data, or unnecessary sensitive detail
Limitations:No bounty, safe-harbor terms, acknowledgement, or remediation timeframe is promised on this page — none of those is currently approved. Live vulnerabilities and exploit detail are never published.

Backup, recovery & continuity

Under review
Access, encryption, integrity, and restoration testing are governed. Dependency, provider, and region considerations are explicit.
Restoration
Does not silently overwrite current evidence or audit history
Owner
Platform · reviewed by Security
Under review:Wording and scope are being reassessed, so this summary should not be relied on as settled. RPO, RTO, and availability figures are not published without maintained evidence and contract scope — Platform Reliability remains a separate, evidence-gated destination.
Provider, Subprocessor & Integration Security

External Systems Are a Controlled Dependency

Provider controls are provider controls. We do not present them as ZoikoTime controls, and we do not inherit assurance from a vendor's certifications.

  • Provider recordpurpose, data categories, access, region, and contractual control.

  • Connector scopescredentials, revocation, and rotation ownership stated explicitly.

  • Transport integritywebhook, file, and API authenticity, replay handling, and failure behavior.

  • Visible limitationsprovider state and constraints stay visible rather than abstracted away.

Subprocessor and provider lists route to the current Privacy sources where approved. Credentials, endpoints, and restricted provider terms are never exposed.

Where a boundary sits

If a connected system is compromised, the blast radius is bounded by the scope you granted it — which is why connector scope, credential ownership, and revocation authority are worth reviewing before you enable one.

A failed integration never broadens access to complete an exchange. Failure states stay visible and owned.

Security Evidence Directory

Seven Control Statuses, Applied Honestly

CurrentUnder reviewPartially implementedException activeSupersededWithdrawnEvidence-gated

Identity & access control summary

Public

Objective, scope, mechanism summary, dependencies, and limitations.

Owner
Security
Reviewed
01 Jul 2026
Status
Current
Limitation: IdP-specific capabilities confirmed per deployment.

Data protection control summary

Public

Classification, minimization, transport and storage protection at public-safe level.

Owner
Security
Reviewed
01 Jul 2026
Status
Current
Limitation: algorithm and key detail via controlled review only.

Change control evidence

Controlled

Release gates, approval records, and rollback evidence at review depth.

Owner
Engineering
Reviewed
15 Jun 2026
Status
Current
Access: governed request. Tooling and repositories excluded.

Logging & retention summary

Public

Event categories, purpose, retention, access, and exclusions.

Owner
Security
Reviewed
01 Jul 2026
Status
Current
Limitation: detection completeness is not measured to a published standard.

Backup & restoration testing

Controlled

Restoration test scope, frequency, and outcome at review depth.

Owner
Platform
Reviewed
Status
Under review
Under review: do not rely on this as settled. No RPO/RTO published.

Independent assessment reports

Controlled

Assessment summaries where current, with issuer, exact scope, and period.

Owner
Security
Reviewed
Status
Evidence-gated
No certification is claimed on this page. Availability is confirmed through review — see the FAQ.

Withdrawn and superseded evidence is not presented as current. Restricted artifact titles are withheld where their existence is itself sensitive, and search terms are never captured in analytics.

Shared Responsibility

Three Columns, No Hidden Transfers

Shared responsibility describes where duties genuinely sit. It is not a mechanism for moving platform obligations onto you.

ZoikoTime

  • Platform security and service identities
  • Secure delivery and change control
  • Environment and tenant separation
  • Security monitoring and incident process
  • Evidence, correction, and disclosure within approved scope
  • Platform defects — these remain ours

Your organization

  • Identity provider configuration and user lifecycle
  • Role assignment and access review
  • Policy configuration and its accuracy
  • Endpoints, devices, and networks
  • Exports once they leave the platform
  • Connected systems you authorize

Providers

  • Contracted infrastructure and services
  • Within their defined scope only
  • Governed by contract, not inherited assurance
  • State and limitations visible to you
One thing a customer administrator can never do

Enable prohibited surveillance. The anti-surveillance invariant is not a default, a setting, or a permission — there is no administrative path to screenshots, keystroke content, URL history, application-name monitoring, or clipboard collection.

Controlled Security Review

Request Evidence That Isn't Public

Access level is determined by identity, purpose, and entitlement. Minimal fields, optional free text, secure delivery with expiry.

Step 1Evidence category
Step 2

Minimum details

Step 3

Optional context

Never include here

Credentials, secrets, exploit or vulnerability detail, worker records, customer data, or legal strategy. If you are reporting a vulnerability, use the security reporting route instead — not this form.

No response time is promised, because no SLA is approved for this route. Nothing you enter appears in the page address or in analytics.

Request statuses

ReceivedNeeds clarificationUnder reviewApprovedPartially approvedDeclined with reason categoryExpiredWithdrawn
Direct Answers

Eight Security Questions

No screenshots, keystroke content, URL history, application-name monitoring, or clipboard collection under any tier or configuration. Security telemetry covers identity, access, change, source-health, service, and incident events — not what a person types, reads, or visits.