Control project time, cost, and delivery — without invasive monitoring
One reviewable system connecting people, projects,
time and approvals — from capture through billing,
payroll and audit.
Project Delivery Workspace
Atlas Retrofit — Phase
2
Meridian Rollout —
QA
Review
Harbor
Migration
Requested
Fragmented project context, not risky workers
Fragmented time records
Hours live across tools with no single reviewable source.
Wrong project context
Time logged to the wrong client, phase or task.
Late approvals
Cutoff pressure pushes review to the last hour.
Disputes without evidence
No version history to resolve a disagreement fairly.
Access outliving assignment
Contributors keep access after a project role ends.
Privacy & trust concerns
Teams resist tools that feel like surveillance.
The Project Delivery Workspace.
Roster, assignment context, record states and governance — aggregate counts first, rows second. Every item shows owner, cutoff, reason and next action.
Every record's path is visible, end to end
Assignment setup
Project and role context
defined.
Time capture
Worker logs against
project/task.
Context switch
Move between projects
cleanly.
Review
Manager checks
against assignment.
Correction
Context requested
where needed.
Approval
Record locked with
history.
Export & closure
Sent downstream,
project closes.
Select project, capture time, correct where permitted.
Client → phase → task, in a few taps. Records stay visible and correctable, with full version history — never hidden.
Switch project context without losing history
Add context to any submitted record
A low-friction approval workspace.
Pending queue, project validation, and cutoff indicators — every action shows who owns it and what happens next.
Neutral labels — Context Requested, not flagged
Exception history at a glance
Approved records, traceable to export.
Project, client, phase, task and cost-center context — only where configured.
Downstream calculations require approved source data and permissions.
Attribution
Project, client, phase, task and cost-center context, validated before export.
Reconciliation
Adjustment history preserved alongside every exported record.
Boundaries
ZoikoTime doesn't determine margin, rates or revenue recognition.
Worker-visible, non-retaliatory correction
Every change captures actor, timestamp, reason, and previous vs. new value — a fair, accessible escalation path.
One effective-dated policy matrix
Legal entity, project contract, worker profile, calendar and retention — versioned, owned, and approved with full change history.
Access Lifecycle
Invitation → scope → provisioning → assignment
dates → expiry → closure. Least-privilege
throughout.
Integrations
Directional flow with roster, project, and finance
systems — approved outputs, reconciled returns.
Closure
Removes access, revokes sessions, preserves
evidence per policy — never silently deletes.
Teams, sites and stakeholders — as peers
Delivery stand-up
On-site review
Cross-functional planning
Remote contributor
Finance handoffFrequently asked questions
It's a governed layer that connects people, project context, time and approvals into one reviewable record — separate from your PM, ERP and billing systems.
No. ZoikoTime is designed around governed time and project records rather than invasive surveillance such as screenshots or keystroke logging.
Workers can correct records where policy permits. Changes retain the actor, timestamp, reason, and previous versus new value so the history remains reviewable.
No. ZoikoTime provides the governed time and project-record layer while working alongside project management, ERP, billing, payroll, and accounting systems.
No. The system focuses on project context, time records, approvals, governance, and evidence rather than individual productivity scoring.
Give every project team clear records,
and every decision a reliable next step.
Evaluate against your projects, workforce mix, approval model,
financial systems and global operating model.